Wednesday, November 26, 2008

AT&T Text Jumbli: Multi Platform Messaging

Thanks Next Great thing for this report on a sweet, mobile behavious campaign linking hundreds of screens in a real world mmp

by NGT

(Most) young people don’t stare at their laptops all day, they actually do go outside from time to time. This is why online media, while effective, isn’t the end-all-be-all of youth marketing that it’s often made out to be. There are hundreds of “touchpoints” to reach young people every day–Facebook, TV, movies, magazines, billboards, branded clothing, and on and on… And of course, there is the mobile phone. You can reach them on it 24/7, wherever they go, it goes. It’s at the center of their lives.

The phone can be the tie that binds all these screens and touchpoints together. With this in mind, we at Mobile Behavior strategized a campaign with AT&T that linked literally thousands of screens to promote their new quick messaging phones.

“AT&T Text Jumbli” is essentially a massive multiplayer game of Boggle. The interactive, real-time word search game pits players from all over the country against each other. These players can be on Facebook, in bars, restaurants, movie theaters, even Manhattan’s Times Square.

The object of the game is to make the highest scoring word before the time runs out. By texting their word to 40411, players are entered into the game and build up their score the more they play. AT&T is giving away hundreds of free new phones to the winners.

Want to play?

  • Log onto Facebook to play on the Jumbli Facebook application
  • Take your phone to New York City’s Times Square
  • Look for it on screens at bars and restaurants nationwide
  • Go to upcoming AT&T events and promotions
  • Tags: Apps & Widgets · Campaigns · Gaming · Marketing & Advertising · Social Networking

    Your Site On Android

    Thanks mobile insider for this post on the G1 and, more importantly, some clear light of day on the realities of the mobile web.

    by Steve Smith , Tuesday, November 25, 2008

    NOW THAT HTC ESTIMATES IT will sell through over 1 million Android-powered G1 phones this year, Apple and RIM may have a contender on their hands. Everyone I have let test-drive the phone likes the operating system, even if they don't come back with the dazzled google eyes of new iPhone converts. And cool appreciation may be all that the Android OS needs in the end to give it an opening in the market. With multiple carriers and handset OEMs on board, Android has a larger addressable audience than the iPhone and likely appeals to a broader audience than the BlackBerry. After using the G1 for a week, and after more than a year in Apple's orchard, I do not feel I would be giving up much by switching platforms.

    But how nicely does this thing play with Web, mobile Web and marketing? I spent a few hours surfing and clicking with the browser to see how it handled a range of sites and ad formats. If the G1 is going to reach the scale HTC is claiming in such a short order, then publishers and marketers, too, should see how their brands look and interact here.

    Sites sniff out the Android browser in various ways. In every case I just put in a straight main Web URL into the address bar but got diverse results. Time Warner properties were inconsistent. Time.com and People.com kicked me over to the mobile iterations, both of which scaled their images nicely in portrait mode. CNN, however, pulled in its full site rather than its very usable mobile alternative. As a result, much of the Flash-enabled interactivity and video are broken. The same was true with NYTimes.com, which also served the full site. In both cases, the main page was simply too large and memory hungry to make a smooth full browser experience. Zooming in and out was halting, at best. I mention this not to scold either brand but to underscore just how over-hyped the mobile full Web experience is. For my money, a well-done mobile version of a brand's main site is almost always preferable to the full site in a mobile browser. In an ideal mobile world, sites could detect your browser and offer to serve either version. Or the browser itself could toggle an option that makes it seen online as a mobile device.

    Except when the mobile version does not show well on a smarter phone. Going to Alpha Media's MaximOnline kicked me over to the mobile version, which became a miniaturized menu of barely perceptible links into the site's content. Worse, clicking into the text link that invited me to take a Coke vs. Pepsi test simply landed me in a bunch of un-rendered HTML code.

    In fact, the mobile conundrum over Web design in a more mobilized world also holds true for advertisers. Full Web browsing on mobile can lead consumers quickly to dead ends. I clicked through on a Disney vacation ad at CondeNet's Concierge only to get dropped onto the Disney Online home page -- all Flash, all broken on this phone. And by the way, if your site uses a large Flash carousel to rotate in feature content, expect it to look like the kids got to the newspaper first and cut out the good stuff. Of course, these same sites look just as bad on the iPhone's full site browser, but in my random testing I found many more sites sniffing the iPhone effectively and redirecting me accordingly.

    Curiously, USA Today proved to be one of the most flexible destinations. It served Android an iPhone version of itself that worked exceptionally well, and even gave me the sliding navigation effect. USA Today is among the sites serving advanced iPhone-specific ads that expand over the page and offers direct access to video. On the G1, the special Ford Motors unit couldn't play, but it politely kicked me over to Ford's main site. A specific micro-site alternative to the iPhone ad would have been preferable, but this solution beats the hell out of a link to nowhere.

    Mobile ads themselves had mixed performance. A few ads just broke altogether and sent a hash of code. The click-to-call button on People Mobile's Samsung Behold landing page clicked into gobbledygook. Video links are iffy because the native video player doesn't seem as seamlessly integrated as I have seen in some smart and feature phones. CarandDriver.com served its mobile site to me and a text link ad for the Slingbox. The video link to the now-ubiquitous TV-in-Russia Sling ad couldn't decide whether it wanted to run in portrait or landscape mode or just give me a half a landscape image in portrait mode. A Transporter3 video trailer coming off of links on ESPN's mobile site just refused to play.

    The obvious lesson in all of this is that marketers and publishers had better grab a G1 and test all of their assets. And don't forget to check all that email marketing. One email marketer recently told me they are seeing a remarkable amount of landing page traffic come from email opened on mobile clients. How many of your email marketing landing page links can sniff out a mobile device? At the very least they should serve this browser a WAP or iPhone version by default and let the user elect to go to a full site. Personally, I think the mobilized full Web experience should be opt-in on most sites anyway.

    But more than that, I suspect developers and marketers are going to have to wrench themselves out of their iPhone daze at some point and wake up to the wider range of rich mobile experiences that will have a market impact in coming months. As the G1 promises to sell 1 million units in under three months, and the BlackBerry Storm inspires iPhone-like lines at Verizon stores, clearly something is afoot. What the iPhone helped jump-start -- the real prospect of satisfying and usable mobile data -- others will drive into other lanes.

    Tuesday, November 25, 2008

    What do YouTube's top 20 clips tell us about user-generated content?

    Thanks to The Guardian for this

    Given its reputation as the home of online user-generated material, YouTube hosts a lot of corporate content these days. Of course, it always has done, from vintage archive material to pirated recent output. But rather than trying to stamp it out, more and more entertainment industry players are getting into bed with YouTube and Google, its parent company: MGM and FremantleMedia, for instance, have entered into deals with the site in recent weeks.

    A look last week at the site's current 20 most viewed clips of all time - all with more than 50m hits - offered a snapshot of the corporatising effect. A good half of them were professional music videos, including work by Avril Lavigne, Chris Brown, Leona Lewis and a saccharine Asian pop number complete with karaoke subtitles, whose popularity has been attributed to its misleading title, xxx.

    Bafflingly, more than 60m hits have also been clocked up by Lezberado: Revenge Fantasies, an impassioned viewer response to the lesbian-themed TV series The L Word, and particularly the despicable behaviour of a character called Jenny. Although it appears to be user-generated, the clip comes under the branding of Showtime, the channel that shows the series.

    Even among actual user-generated content, many of the most popular clips are based on bestselling pop culture, albeit in creative ways: the evergreen Evolution of Dance plays on its audience's familiarity with dance crazes, while Crank Dat Soulja Boy Spongebob is a cunning mash-up of the infectious dance hit and the infectious cartoon series. Potter Puppet Pals in The Mysterious Ticking Noise is part of an entertaining series of puppet-based fan fiction - this particular episode offers an a cappella song made up of the characters' names, and ends with a bang.

    The only exceptions are moments of home-video larking about involving laughing babies - see Hahaha and Charlie bit my finger - again ! - and a virtuoso guitar solo delivered by an adolescent with his face hidden by a baseball cap (guitar).

    When it comes to wholly original content conceived, executed and uploaded by a YouTube user, one video is in a league of its own - the Spanish-language short Lo que tú quieras oír (Whatever You Want to Hear) shown above, by Guillermo Zapata. It's a cute little story about a woman, Sofía, who returns home to find her husband has dumped her by answerphone; she re-edits the message, turning it into a plea that she take him back - which she then rejects. Whether it deserves more than 77m hits is arguable, but it's notable that the film engages with creative editing as subject matter - Sofía essentially creates a mash-up of her husband's message - and was posted under a Creative Commons license, which allows for wide redistribution of the material rather than attempting to assert conventional copyright control. In these ways, it shows both where user-generated content is, and where it's heading.


    Interactive overalls - some amusing insights on making the real world interactive

    Thanks Next Great Thing for this.
    I love all this stuff, but what's bugging me is the transactional angle. I mean despite lacking a 'screen', a code, or not being interactive in any way, overalls are very very relevant to a bunch of people in a load of situations. So, rather then trying ot force new relevance into an old product, why not look for new, screen based ways to find and deliver our product to those who want and need it? Home renovation iphone app that helps you pick apint colours etc then sources products, including our overalls, and allows to buy them and have them delivered to your GPS location?

    Thoughts?

    Reviving Overalls: 6 Tips on Multi-Channel Strategy by Allison

    In this week’s New York Time’s Magazine, Benjamin Palmer (Barbarian Group), Lars Bastholm (AKQA) and Robert Rasmussen (R/GA) discussed how the proliferation of screens (big, small, PC and mobile) will affect advertising and marketing. At one point, moderator by Jack Hitt proposed a mock case study of “Jack’s Overalls,” an old-school functional clothing maker. The brainstorm that ensued grappled with how you can use all these new media channels to make overalls relevant to people today. We’re pulled out 6 top “to-dos”, along with some comments from the peanut gallery…

    1) Create Relevance

    Palmer: So you have to create a new market. Farming may be going away, but what’s on the rise? Right now your overalls are made with special pockets and holders for farming tools. Maybe we retool them for urban farmers, as it were, and their specialized gear. You have special pockets for your iPhone and your BlackBerry, and a pocket for your headphones, another for your wallet, your subway card, your keys.

    We’ve actually seen a number of manufacturers taking this cargo-style approach like SeV’s tricked out sportswear to Thomas Pink’s iPod Tie. Guys hate carrying bags, so this is a good idea.

    2) Embrace Technology

    Bastholm: Let’s really take the brand into the 21st century, shall we? Why don’t we put a ShotCode on the front of every single pair of overalls. A ShotCode is like a bar code. You scan it with the camera in your cellphone. And then something comes out the other end. With bar codes, it’s a price. But with a ShotCode, it could be a song, it could be a picture, it could be a link to a Web site.

    Sure to attract small contingents in NYC and San Fran and get some tech-cred, but not much potential for mainstream. Ralph Lauren recently used barcodes in marketing its Rugby line and not many people actually used it (downloading the reader was a big barrier). But hey, it looks cool.

    3) Market to Niches

    Palmer: But you don’t want to suddenly be seen as, like, this newfangled Internet overall company. If you’re talking to somebody who’s over 40, that’s going to freak them out, you know? So this becomes your special-edition ShotCode overalls. You place ads only on social networks, like MySpace or Flickr. Facebook users can buy the Facebook edition of these overalls. They come precoded with your Facebook page embedded as your ShotCode. But if you’re not a Facebook person, you’re never going to know about this unique brand…. It’s self-selecting, actually. The more narrowly you talk to your audience through these new screens, the more people and products will gravitate toward one another. And nobody else will necessarily know or care that that’s happening.

    Great point, something we’ve thought about ourselves. Everyone doesn’t NEED to “get” it. Just the cool kids.

    4) Branded Utility

    Rasmussen: I would recommend a Web presence built around a utility that engages consumers and allows them to take your brand and own it. Maybe you give customers the ability to mix and match your overalls with other clothes. Maybe you create a widget that lets you drag your overalls and drop them onto an existing image. And the program blends the overalls with the outfit, so you can say, “Boom, that’s how it would look if I wore a pair of cord overalls with a blue jean jacket.”

    Ah, widgets… as sick as we are of hearing about them, the man has a point. This tool reminds us of Instyle.com’s hair makeover tool and “Hair Style” in South Korea that allows users to virtually try on new hairstyles and then locate a salon near to create a similar haircut–all through their phones..

    5) Sharability

    Bastholm: My company developed this mobile application called Nike Photo ID, where you take a picture with your cellphone of anything and it sends you back a pair of sneakers in the two dominant colors in that picture. So maybe we create a site called Overall This. Send in a picture of somebody and get them back in overalls.

    Rasmussen: Then you can post the images on your Web site. Create a gallery that shows how overalls can mesh with many styles, from metro to hip-hop to blue collar. People can comment and vote on their favorites.

    We like the name of the site Overall This. Equally sigh of resignation, fightin’ words, and friendly invitation. But then we’re just suckers for wordplay.

    Overall (no pun intended) some solid ideas on how to string multiple platforms and channels together to create a multi-pronged and fully integrated approach.


    Monday, November 24, 2008

    Living and Learning with New Media: Findings from a 3-year Ethnographic Study of Digital Youth

    Thanks Futurelab for releaseing this report on young people and social media

    by: danah boyd

    For the last three years, I've been a part of a team of researchers at Berkeley and USC focused on digital youth practices. This project, funded by the MacArthur Foundation, brought together 28 different researchers (led by Mimi Ito and my now deceased advisor Peter Lyman) to examine different aspects of American youth life. As many of you know, I focused on normative teen practices and the ways in which teens engaged in networked publics. We are now prepared to share our findings:

    Already, write-ups of our research have hit the press:

    Needless to say, we're excited by our research and uber excited by the coverage that we're getting. For years, we've been finding that youth do amazingly positive things with the technology that they use. Yet, during that time, we've watched as parents and news media continue to focus solely on what is negative. We're hoping that this report will help adults get a decent sense of what's going on.

    For those who are only familiar with my research, I strongly encourage you to check out the report to get a better sense of the context in which I've been working. I focus primarily on "friendship-driven practices" but the "interest-driven practices" that motivate creative production, gaming, and all sorts of user generated content are tremendously important. I focus primarily on what happens when teens "hang out" but there's also amazing learning moments when they mess around and geek out with one another.

    The book is currently available only in draft form but an updated print version will be available in the future. In the meantime, enjoy, and feel free to ask questions!!

    Original Post: http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/11/20/living_and_lear.html


    If i started in social media today

    Thanks Chris Brogan for this outline on getting started in social media
    November 22, 2008

    party Okay, so you’ve heard from someone that this social media and social networking stuff is great and you should get involved, and it’s really going to help you out. Maybe it will help you in the economic downturn. Maybe you have heard how you can use Twitter for business. But there’s a lot to it all.

    Where would you start? What would come first? How might you think about getting out there and joining in on the experience?

    If I Started Today

    Here’s what I’m going to do. I’ll build three different scenarios out, and give you the starting points for what I’d do with social media if I were in these steps. Try to extrapolate them out to your profession or your need. If you really want to have fun with this post, take what I’ve started here, and write your own post for your vertical or condition, and then be sure to share the ideas with us here, so we can go to your site and check it out. (We’ll even be able to visit via trackbacks, if you link back to the original post).

    Before it All: Listening

    (Note: this was updated after Lucretia pointed out that I probably inadvertently forgot to mention it.)

    Listening is my first move in starting to understand social media. That means this: go and read the blogs that are out there. Read from different genres. Go visit Twitter.com and more importantly search.twitter.com, and see what people are saying. Read comments on people’s blogs and see which ones seem to get any response. Search using Google and Technorati.com, and start listening to conversations that are out there.

    And then, start here.

    First Platform: A Blog

    No matter what, the very first piece of social media real estate I’d start with is a blog. It’s a website, with lots of built in features that make it useful from a search perspective, and simple from a content creation perspective. That alone is worth the price of admission.

    Don’t worry as much about the features, although certain companies make blogging platforms that go above and beyond simple content publishing. Don’t focus hard on the add-ons and whizbangs, but do know that a bare bones, out of the box blog is about as appealing as two slices of bread with a piece of bologna on it.

    Now, let’s break that into three potential scenarios.

    Personal branding: I’d buy my own domain name, and host it somewhere inexpensive, but with good service.

    Company communications: I’d use an off-brand domain, with a “powered by” mindset, similar to Digital Nomads by Dell. Meaning, I wouldn’t necessarily do a “product blog” or a “corporate voice” blog as much as I’d want to do a “something useful to people” blog. Exceptions: really big corporations with lots of bloggers, like Sun, IBM, Cisco, etc.

    Nonprofit: I’d start a storytelling and pictures blog about the causes I was tasked with supporting. No question about it: stories and pictures are powerful contributors to nonprofit experiences.

    For blog topics and other ideas, I’ve collected my best advice, and that should get you started there.

    Second Step: Outposts

    In all cases, I’d build outposts which help me reach into lots of different places and communicate with people where they might be. Depending on my needs, I might use different tools. At the very minimum, I’d start accounts on:

    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook

    I might or might not then pick one or two more specialized networks. Let’s look at how this works for our three examples.

    Personal: use Twitter to build relationships and share interests. Use Facebook to learn about groups and events of interest. Keep LinkedIn active and updated, and stay involved in the answering of questions part of the site. Goal here: keep your name out there, far ahead of when you might need anything from anyone.

    Company: use Twitter as a way to show that you’re humans in there. I like how Dell has several namesatDELL type accounts like RichardATDell and LionelATDell, etc. You could also just be yourself, like ScottMonty from Ford, or astrout(Aaron Strout) from Powered. Use Facebook as individuals and LinkedIn as individuals, but with a group purpose. You might participate in other people’s groups. You might find friends with like interests or similar demographics and reach out to them that way. Be human. That’s the main goal here.

    Nonprofit: depending on the cause, you could either use Twitter as the cause name, or you can reach out as an individual. There are both in the field, and I’ve yet to see which is more productive. Maybe a nonprofit can comment on their experiences here. On Facebook and LinkedIn, be the individual, but form groups around your causes, and invite people who might be like minded into the groups.

    With all three groups, the specific networks I mentioned at the beginning of these segments would obviously vary. One note: don’t use those tools that push your status across multiple platforms. I understand that it’s simpler to update things that way, but it also means that you don’t respect your individual audiences at those outposts.

    In all cases, use your picture for the avatar, not a logo. Try to get a candid shot that’s not a stuffy professional photo, but one that isn’t a cropped picture of you next to some ex relation.

    In all cases, put enough information in your profile to connote that you’re at once a business person as well as a human being. In Facebook, consider which applications you add to your profile. Yes, being a pirate or a vampire might be fun, but it might also make someone question your professional intent. But do feel free to share your interests in books or movies or sports, and make sure your status messages aren’t always and forever about your business interests, or people might be less engaged after a very short amount of time.

    I also have my best advice about social networking to help you there, too.

    Third Step: Audience

    Once you have a primary place to express yourself (your blog), and a few outposts where you can communicate in a less structured, more real time way (outposts), the next then I would do is find like minds. It depends on your business goals what you might do with this audience, and for some people, this might not apply as much. For the three examples I gave, it would be an important thing to build a level of followership and interaction across your platforms, so we’ll cover this all as one group, not as separate goals.

    My best advice about building community and audience is this: be helpful. Write blog posts that others can use (like this one, for instance). The more you can help others, the more they’ll come back.

    Avoid writing “me too” blog posts about the latest news in your vertical. Chances are, someone else is doing it better, and your “me too” is just a throat-clearing proof that you’re not creating original content. Work harder on doing something original instead of just pumping out “I read this article about” types of posts, unless you’re going to expand on the ideas, and/or recast them for your particular audience.

    If you’re writing for a company, maybe these blog topics will spark some ideas. If you’re writing a personal blog, here are 100 blog topics to get you started.

    More important in growing a community: comment. Go out to other people’s blogs and start getting involved. Use a service like BackType to learn what other people are saying and where they’re commenting. The more you make your voice heard in the general space where you want to do business, the better you’ll be.

    Note something important: you might want to think about commenting in two places. First, where your peers are writing their stuff makes sense as a place to comment, but that will only bring you into a better relationship with your peers in a space. If you want to start building business, start learning to comment on your customers’ blogs, in your customers’ verticals, where your customers are spending their online time.

    Fourth Step: Experiment

    If something’s not working, try something else. If you’re not using analytics and stats packages to learn more about your web visitors, you’re missing out. If you aren’t learning how these social media elements tie to your business, and you’re just using them as another isolated thing, then you’re missing the whole reason to start (for businesses, at least).

    Experiment. Try new things. I try something new every day. It might be a blog post. It might be a strategy about how I can get more people to do X instead of Y. It might be something as simple as reaching out to other people in new ways. But experiment. If you just sit around doing the same things you did to start out, you might as well turn in now.

    I just gave myself another idea even writing this post. That’s the power of experimenting. You learn by doing, not reading. So, read all this, but then do something.

    Your Turn

    What would you tell people about starting out? If you want to adapt this to your specific blogging or media making interest, what would you tell people differently? How else might you serve your community?

    Or, what do you have further questions about? This would be a great post to encourage people to ask questions, and share with the rest of the larger community.

    What do you need to start today?

    Congratulations Motrin. You just proved why every brand needs to understand Social Media

    Thanks Hard Knox life for this topliner on the current Motrin social web blunder

    Are you still trying to convince your management why your brand should be monitoring Social Media? Well if you are a Consumer Packaged Good brand (or any brand really), just look at what happened to Motrin over the past couple of days and the reaction of Motrin Moms.

    A simple search on Twitter of #motrinmoms will show you that they pissed off one hell of a lot of people with their latest ad around “babywearing.” Mommy Bloggers are not people you want to mess with and you sure better understand the sandbox you are playing in if you do them wrong. For instance, just look at this Consumer Generated Media that has already popped up in response. Not exactly brand content you want at the top of search results.

    The Lesson for Brand Managers:

    Motrin screwed up. It happens. But in today’s world of Social Media, the place they really screwed up was in not monitoring what people were saying about the brand. This PR disaster is happening underneath their nose and no one on the brand is responding. Not their advertising agency, not their Public Relations group and not the brand itself. The unfortunate fact is that company’s haven’t trained Brand Managers to respond quickly to situations like this. That needs to change….and it needs to change fast.


    People are going to be talking about your brand, with or without the Brand Manager’s permission. This simple fact is reason enough that you should be monitoring the conversations around your brand. Motrin is just the latest brand to learn this lesson the hard way.

    UPDATE - Well it looks like Motrin is trying to respond. If you commented on their website, it looks like their VP of Marketing has a response that is being sent out (Thanks to Amy Gates for the lead). And the Motrin.com site has been taken down for now, but thanks to the power of YouTube, you can still see the video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmykFKjNpdYBill Seaver) (Thanks